Joe's Blog
Wk 1 Reading: We Can Copy, Right?
I graduated High School in 1999 and was starting my freshmen year of
college when the mp3 boom began. I had just moved out of my parents
house and moved into my first apartment with my friend Mike. We were the
type of guys who loved to be on the forefront of everything especially
the internet. My buddy Mike got a Job working for the cable company, who
at the time were rolling out lightning fast (slow by today's
comparison) cable modems. These modems were to replace the old dial-up
connection that many of us first encountered in the old AOL days of the
internet. Little did we know that this modem would open up a whole new
world to us and put us on a path to total local celebrity status. We
first entered a chat room in using a little known program called My
Internet Relay Chat or Mirc for short. Here we found a whole community
of collectors of a small music file known as an mp3. The first songs
that we downloaded were the classics like The Beastie Boys Fight for
your right (to party), or Ozzy Osborn's Crazy Train. Soon we discovered a
new program making its way around the channels known as Napster. This
was a revolution in the Person to Person, or P2P file transfer protocol
that we were using in Mirc. The only difference was that you did not
need to ask people if they had the file, here all you had to do was type
in the name in their search engine and you were shown multiple hits of
the file, and which location had the fastest connection to retrieve it.
It was an amazing concept that me and my friend Mike wished we had come
up with.
Soon we were having people come over challenging them to find the most
rare songs they could think of, like Bob Marley's Guava Jelly or Slick
Rick's original Ladi Dodi. With all these fiends coming over to complete
their searches we amassed a large library of songs, and soon became the
go to apartment for parties and music lounging sessions. Many people
would ask where the music was coming from and I would reply "From my
computer." No one believed me so I would always give them a tour and
show them my setup and my playlist on the original mp3 computer program
WinAmp. They were amazed, but many of my friends believed this was a fad
and would soon go away like 8-tracks. I was so sure this was not a fad
that I used the topic of mp3s and the future of music as my final
persuasive argument in my public speaking class.It was a great time of
my life broadening my love for music and making my first few year of
college completely worth while.
Why did I start this blog off with this story? Because even though I
believe an artist has the right to protect his work, I also believe that
the trading of mp3's is not the nail in the coffin that record industry
makes it out to be. I remember when I was about 4 or 5 years old
hearing how the VCR was going to kill movies and ruin the art of cinema
being seen on the big screen. The industry soon found out that the
proliferation of home media not only helped the industry, but added on a
whole new consumer base that they had never thought possible. I believe
the same can be said for the mp3's. The proliferation of the mp3 only
adds to the appreciation of music thus raising music to a new and higher
standard than ever before. Before mp3's I lead a sheltered life, only
buying the occasional CD for bands that the radio told me were popular.
After I started downloading mp3's my musical education grew, exposing me
to the rich sounds of reggae, the unique rhymes of rappers like Biggie
and Tupac, and the eclectic sounds like radiohead. Mp3's forced me to
broaden my horizons, listen to new bands on a whim, and go to more live
shows and concerts than ever before. The mp3 was a game changer for many
young people back in the early 2000's and I believe it still is for
many youths today. The fact is, I spent more money on music after the
mp3 age than I did before.
Sure there are those that abuse the system and take take take, but don't
forget about those how give back. Today we see a plethora of musicians
trying to make a mark in today's industry who may not have ever had a
chance before. Take Justin Bieber (no really take him, haha), he got his
start by posting videos of his talents on YouTube, a video site with
its roots stemming from the mp3 sub-culture of the early 2000's. With
this new medium many more artist can fill the world with their talents,
or lack there of, allowing the American culture to determine who is
worthy of praise and who is not. This I believe is what the recording
industry is afraid of, we the people now have the power to determine who
is popular, not the gigantic spin machine that we call the Recording
Industry Association of America. The RIAA now in today's world seems
insignificant, the power is now placed into the peoples internet.
Artists now see that they can produce and market their art on their own
with only a simple $1000 computer and an internet connection. Trent
Reznor of Nine Inch Nails fame found this out when he released his own
album off the internet all on his own and asked for donations instead of
a set price. It are these situations that the big corporate giants hate
because there is no need for a middle man any more.
The creation of the Creative Commons is the next evolutionary step of
the P2P transfer protocol, that was so famously smashed with the demise
of napster, bearshare, and limewire. This new P2P system places artist
right directly on the property the individuals wish to use or listen to
from their own computer. By placing the option of fair use back into the
hands of the creator we limit the corporate stranglehold our ideas and
though have been suffocating from for so long. Creative commons is a
breath of fresh air for the little man who normal stands beneath the
shadows of the corporate giants.
Joe,
Great post. I am a true music lover I find pleasure in every genre. I agree the Internet enhanced my musical taste by allowing me to hear more artist before buying the album. I also agree that some people take advantage and never give back. As an artist my self it is hard to download music and not compensate the creator for their intellectual property. Musical ideas have been recycled for hundreds of years now but the new laws pose a huge hurtle for this cycle of recycling musical ideas and motifs. Before the sampling era musicians would draw influence from other artist and recreate that sound to fit the idea floating in their head. Now sampling takes the exact idea and reuses it to create a new sound. I think there should be a standard rate to sample or reuse some ones material and if the new creations sales a certain amount then a lager portion should be given to the original artist. I know that wont stop the illegal use of creative ideas but it might start building a bridge.